NYU Data Science newsletter – February 2, 2016

NYU Data Science Newsletter features journalism, research papers, events, tools/software, and jobs for February 2, 2016

GROUP CURATION: N/A

 
Data Science News



Research on persuasive visualization and risk communication

Alberto Cairo, The Functional Art


from January 31, 2016

A while ago a group of researchers (Enrico Bertini among them) published a paper titled “The Persuasive Power of Data Visualization”. I’ve been interested in how to make information graphics convincing since I read this New York Times story, but I somehow assumed that research about the topic was limited and sparse. I was wrong.

Yesterday I met with one of our PhD candidates at the School of Communication of the University of Miami. Her name is Fan Yang. She’s interested in the communication of risk, and in how charts, maps, and infographics can lead to behavioral change.

Fan shared more than twenty papers she is planning to quote in her dissertation.

 

University of Maryland, JOUR479V / JOUR779V: Computational Journalism – Spring 2016

Nick Diakopoulos


from January 29, 2016

This course explores the conceptualization and application of computational and data-driven approaches to journalism practice. Students will examine how computational techniques are changing journalistic data gathering, curation, sensemaking, presentation, dissemination, and analytics of content. Methods from text analysis, social computing, automated news production, simulation / prediction / modeling, algorithmic accountability, and content analytics will be applied to real journalistic scenarios. Several assignments, both critical and creative in nature, as well as an integrative final project will serve to underscore the concepts taught and provide practice in producing artifacts of computational journalism.

 

What Kind of Data Scientist Do You Need?

Harvard Business Review, Michael Li


from February 01, 2016

If you’re looking to hire a data scientist to join your company, you’re not alone. At The Data Incubator, we work with hundreds of companies that are looking to find data scientists from our Fellowship Program. In our experience, candidates usually come from one of two disciplines: computations or statistics.

Candidates with a strong science or math background usually have had rigorous statistical training in distinguishing between signal and noise and can tell when they are “overfitting” a complex model. Those with a computer science background frequently have the software engineering chops to handle large amounts of data by taking advantage of parallel and distributed computing. While all data scientists need to be functional in both, we’ve found that people coming from each of these backgrounds have quite different strengths and weaknesses. So which type of background should you look for when hiring? That will depend on your business — and whether you’re hiring for a digital or non-digital department.

 

Where should you put your data scientists? – O’Reilly MediaO’ReillyconfigureClose MenuOpen Menucodecodefacebooktwitteryoutube-largegooglelinkedin

O'Reilly Media, Daniel Tunkelang


from January 07, 2016

It’s hard to recruit data scientists. But once you have them, where should you put them? What is the best way to unleash their value? Every org structure has trade-offs. Let’s walk through a few possibilities and explore their pros and cons.

 

How to Hire the Best Senior Talent On Analytics And Data Science | Demystifying Data Analytics, Decision Science & Digital

Sameer Dhanrajani, Demystifying Data Analytics, Decision Science & Digital blog


from February 01, 2016

Data scientists are trained to handle uncertainty. The data we work with, no matter how “big” it may be, remains a finite sample riddled with potential biases. Our models tread the fine line between being too simple to be meaningful and too complex to be trusted. Armed with methodologies to control for noise in our data, we simulate, test and validate everything we can. A great data scientist develops a healthy skepticism of their data, their methods and their conclusions.

Then, one day, a data scientist is promoted and presented with an entirely new challenge: Evaluating a candidate to become a member of their team. The sample size drops fast, experimentation seems impractical, and the biases in interviewing are orders of magnitude more obvious than those we carefully control for in our work. We will try to outline the goals of a new process, describe its underlying principles, and walk through the implementation of hiring senior talent.

 

Recognizing correct code

MIT News, Martin Rinard


from January 29, 2016

MIT researchers have developed a machine-learning system that can comb through repairs to open-source computer programs and learn their general properties, in order to produce new repairs for a different set of programs.

The researchers tested their system on a set of programming errors, culled from real open-source applications, that had been compiled to evaluate automatic bug-repair systems. Where those earlier systems were able to repair one or two of the bugs, the MIT system repaired between 15 and 18, depending on whether it settled on the first solution it found or was allowed to run longer.

 

The Beckman Report on Database Research

Communications of the ACM


from February 01, 2016

A group of database researchers meets periodically to discuss the state of the field and its key directions going forward. Past meetings were held in 1989,6 1990,11 1995,12 1996,10 1998,7 2003,1 and 2008.2 Continuing this tradition, 28 database researchers and two invited speakers met in October 2013 at the Beckman Center on the University of California-Irvine campus for two days of discussions. The meeting attendees represented a broad cross-section of interests, affiliations, seniority, and geography. Attendance was capped at 30 so the meeting would be as interactive as possible. This article summarizes the conclusions from that meeting; an extended report and participant presentations are available at http://beckman.cs.wisc.edu.

 
Events



Workshop on Social Media and Demographic Methods at PAA 2016



This training workshop is organized by the IUSSP Scientific Panel on Big Data and Population Processes as a side event at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, taking place in Washington, D.C. 31 March-2 April 2016.

Description: Demography has been a data-driven discipline since its birth. Data collection and the development of formal methods have sustained most of the major advances in our understanding of population processes. The global spread of Social Media has generated new opportunities for demographers:

  • the increasing quantity of our online traces can be aggregated and mined for population research;
  • formal demographic models can be used to understand the dynamics of online populations;
  • social media affect people’s activities and life planning in a way that demographers are well prepared to study.
  • Wednesday, March 30, in Washington DC.

     
    Deadlines



    Summer Institute in Survey Research Techniques, June 6 – July 29

    deadline: subsection?

    The Summer Institute in Survey Research Techniques is a teaching program of the Survey Research Center at the Institute for Social Research. It is located on the central campus of the University of Michigan at 426 Thompson Street in Ann Arbor. The summer courses are select offerings from the Michigan Program in Survey Methodology, and can be used to pursue a doctorate, master of science and a certificate in survey methodology.

    Ann Arbor, MI. Deadline for completed application is Sunday, May 15. Applicants for Summer Guest admission will be reviewed on the basis of their qualifications and experience. Summer Guests must complete both the enrollment process with the University of Michigan Registrar’s Office and with the Summer Institute.

     
    CDS News



    CDS Fellow Interview: Daniela Huppenkothen

    NYU Center for Data Science


    from February 01, 2016

    The Moore-Sloan Data Science Environment Summit is an annual meeting between the data science centers at New York University, the University of California at Berkley and the University of Washington. We spoke with Daniela Huppenkothen, a Data Science Fellow at NYU’s Center for Data Science about her experience at the 2015 summit.

    Can you tell us about your work and experience as a Data Science Fellow at NYU?

    I spend my time working at the Center for Data Science and the Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, where I’ve been studying statistical and machine learning methods in Astronomy. At NYU, I found a combination of experts in data science methodologies, and domain experts in Astronomy and Physics.

     

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published.